Showing posts with label Marian Pierre-Louis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marian Pierre-Louis. Show all posts

Sunday, September 13, 2015

June APGQ -- another magazine on the "must-read" shelf

For those who are members of the Association of Professional Genealogists, the June 2015 issue of the APG Quarterly just went on line. Yes, it's late, but it's looking like a quarterly full of articles I want to read and need to read -- and a real incentive for serious genealogists who are not yet members to join APG.

No, I'm not impartial. My own article, "A Field Guide to Indirect Evidence," is in the mix -- that was supposed to be the reason for this blog post! And I do chair the quarterly's advisory committee (but aside from my article, we had no involvement in the process).

Nor have I had a chance to read through it. But who couldn't find several things to love in the regular reviews and interviews, and the rest of the table of contents?

* Lisa Alzo interviewing four professionals on staying professional on social media.
* Sara Scribner on JSTOR and LibGuides. (Yes, I did say, "What's a LibGuide?")
* Barbara Ball on georeferencing.
* Marian Pierre-Louis on making sure you put your best online foot forward.
* George Morgan on organization for presenters.
* Michael Hait on the difference between a report and a case study. (Anyone going for certification without knowing this? Time to find out!)
* Blaine Bettinger on Genetic Genealogy Standards.




Saturday, December 18, 2010

Data mining past publications

Marian Pierre-Louis shared this interesting link from the Boston Globe via Facebook about a new study published in Science and a new tool Google has made publicly available. The gist:

Google is publicly launching the tool, Google Books Ngram Viewer, to allow scholars or the simply curious to ask questions, such as when references to “The Great War,’’ which peaked between 1915 and 1941, were replaced by “World War I.’’ The tool allows people to look up words or phrases that range from one to five words, and see their occurrences over time — the frequency that a word is mentioned in a given year divided by the total number of words written that year.

I'm sure we can learn a lot from this. And like all tools going back to the sharp stick, it can be misused as well. Counting things is never the whole story. As noted in the article, the way in which words are used may mean more than their frequency. And sometimes the revealing fact lies in what things that are not mentioned, what books were never published, or words whose meaning has subtly shifted over time.