Once again it's time for the monthly popularity contest, listing the most-viewed blog
posts made here during December.
And once again the top finisher ran well ahead of the pack: "We still need to understand that no single record is automatically
correct or even trustworthy; they all need corroboration from other
independently created records if we can possibly find them. We still
need to understand how to analyze a single record and correlate it with
other types. From this point of view 2013 looks very much like 1993 --
or, for that matter, 1893."
1. What Does It Mean to Be "Out of Date"? (December 13)
2. Perfectionism: Is The Best the Enemy? (December 31)
3. Overcommitted and Underperforming (December 7)
4. Don't Ask Your 1820s Ancestor What His "Job" Was (December 27)
5. Was That a Deadline I Just Missed? (December 28)
Least viewed:
Gems from New England (December 18)
Harold Henderson, "Most Viewed MWM Posts December 2012," Midwestern Microhistory: A Genealogy Blog, posted 4 February 2013 (http://midwesternmicrohistory.blogspot.com : accessed [access date]). [Please feel free to link to the specific post if you prefer.]
Monday, February 4, 2013
Most Viewed MWM Posts December 2012
Posted by
Harold Henderson
at
12:30 AM
0
comments
Labels: American Ancestors Magazine, deadlines, Eric Arnesen, perfectionism, time management, Val Greenwood
Friday, December 28, 2012
Was That a Deadline I Just Missed?
Football fans know how teams try to avoid surprises by having defensive players play deep, so that they can see any surprise run or pass right away: "Keep everything in in front of you." Good editors and others who must impose deadlines try to act the same way. Ideally they check in before the deadline just to make sure everything is going OK and to make any necessary adjustments.
For those of us writers and others on the other side of the deadline, what does this imply?
(1) Keep track of deadlines and don't let them sneak up on you. Even procrastinators need to know what they're procrastinating about!
(2) If you see trouble, or know you're going to miss a deadline, keep the editor informed ahead of time. When possible, propose an alternative deadline, and deliver that on time.
The worst thing you can do for your reputation is to keep silent -- even if you're working all the time on the project, no one will know it if you don't say so. Editors are of necessity flexible but they are not mind-readers. (And if social media enable them to read your mind, make sure your posts are what you want them to read!)
Actually I did not discover these facts as a writer or editor, but as a homeowner who does not do his own work. My wife and I soon learned that few contractors show up when promised. (We have our folk-sociological explanations.) Once we happened onto a fellow who called ahead and told us he couldn't make it that day. Needless to say, he was our one and only guy as long as he lived, and we still miss him.
Not knowing what's going on is almost always worse than knowing . . . and not knowing brings out the worst in those kept in the dark.
Harold Henderson, "Was That a Deadline I Just Missed?," Midwestern Microhistory: A Genealogy Blog, posted 28 December 2012 (http://midwesternmicrohistory.blogspot.com : accessed [access date]). [Please feel free to link to the specific post if you prefer.]
Posted by
Harold Henderson
at
12:30 AM
0
comments
Labels: deadlines